brinking - nabeel hyatt

SXSW last minute voting

I'm late in getting this up, so I'll need all the help I can get from you guys.

I love how SXSW lets attendees vote on the panels they want to see, so I decided to take it one step further and I sent an email to 10 friends to get their votes on which topic I should submit. I eliminated anything on virtual goods, since I was part of a panel on that at last year's SXSW, and instead focused on things like music games, synchronous social network design, and what it's like to have web developers and game developers working together.

There's only a couple weeks left to vote for the SXSW panels you actually want to see, so head on over to vote. The first link is my talk, as chosen by friends, followed by some others I found interesting:

• Are music games the new iTunes?

• The present and future of 3D in Flash
  
  
• Applying game design techniques to social software
  
  
• Scaling your culture without losing your "secret sauce"
  
  
• Who is playing what? Online gameplaying trends

What else should I be voting for?

The Loudcrowd private alpha, and a startup meetup

In case you haven't already read on the internet, some intrepid bloggers have been having fun in our private alpha and decided to write a bit about it. There's more over at the Conduit blog, including the coverage in this weekend's Boston Globe.

And I'll be speaking at the YCombinator Cambridge/Boston Startup Meetup on Monday night along with some area founders and likely a bunch of YCombinator companies. Paul Graham will be answering questions, Kevin Merritt will be telling his story, and they asked me to say something. Since so many people give dire post mortems of how they screwed up their startups, I thought I'd talk about how you know if your startup is actually working.

See you there, or at Loudcrowd.

The problem with snacking.

You never get a meal. I've been twittering, tumblring, friend feeding, and having great long talks with co-workers about the industry. I haven't been having enough on my blog. Has it really been two months? I've got to do something about that.

In my defense, I have a new kid, and a product that just went into private alpha. So I have been keeping busy. Still, more to come.

Harvard panel on non-competes and the example of Turbine

I wasn't able to make the event at Harvard about non-competition agreements recently due to my second kid being born, but wanted to share Scott Kirsner's coverage of the event:

Harvard prof. Lee Fleming said that people and ideas move from states that enforce non-competes to states that don’t (think California.) His research has found that non-competes squelch employee mobility by about 20 percent, and 30 percent for experts in a given field. Fleming asked whether non-competes might stifle the reallocation of the best people to the best business opportunities.

A great example of this effect just came to my attention. It turns out that Turbine has been trying to introduce new non-competes. Now, I haven't actually seen the agreements but apparently they have some clauses saying you are not to work for a gaming company within 100 miles (or something like that). Many of the professions in game development are industry specific (level designer anyone?) which essentially means that once an employee has worked at Turbine he is almost guaranteed to move away from Boston for his next job.

This is particularly ridiculous in Turbine's case, since just recently an employee left for Harmonix then thought better of it after a few months and returned to Turbine. With their new non-compete agreement this would never happen, as the person would have likely left Boston altogether and simply taken a different job wherever they had moved. Turbine is poisoning their own pond out of fear instead of building the company from strength.

OpenCoffee for founders tomorrow in Cambridge

Just a reminder that if you've got a pre/early launch startup and are looking for partners, that's the focus of tomorrow's OpenCoffee in Cambridge. More info at Going.com -- come by anytime between 8:30am (for early risers) and 10:30am (for coming in after traffic).

By the way, if you haven't checked out Going.com lately, I really like what they've been doing over there. The new hangouts feature is much more how I think about locations (versus events), and the "people like you" is a nice touch. They've become my top source for off-the-beaten path hip events when I'm in NY, where they have an awesome community.

What makes a Social Game, a social game?

It's been a little frustrating to watch as the term Social Gaming is being applied to practically everything on a social network - so much so that even single player games on Facebook are now "social games." The folks at GigaOm have been pinging me about writing an editorial for a while, and this topic seemed worth starting a wider dialog about, so here it is:

What makes games social? (GigaOm)

Are online games going to kill themselves at retail?

Yesterday Raph Koster posted the photo on the right of a full rack of Target gift cards for online games, from Puzzle Pirates to Zwinky. That led Jeremy Liew to talk about the power of gift cards to allow young players who do not have credit cards to pay for virtual goods. And while I share Jeremy's enthusiasm that gift cards are an excellent monetization method, I am also worried about what it means for the next wave of online gaming startups.

It's no secret that monetization is one of the areas where virtual worlds and gaming can teach a thing or two to the web folks. From Maplestory gift cards to Rock Band tracks, consumers have shown they are willing and able to pay for digital gaming content. Even if the techniques are unique, including everything from virtual goods, gifting, dual-currency (time & cash) based economies, and level-based subscriptions, the culture is one of paying for playing. Which is good for those of us trying to keep the lights on.

Despite this willingness, virtual goods still have the penny gap. It is never easy to get someone, especially a teenager, to type in a credit card online. Which is why walking down a Target or CVS nowadays means easily finding cards hawking virtual 8bit furniture from Habbo, virtual DKNY gear from Stardoll, or a new sword for Nexon's Maple Story.

RE-INTRODUCING THE RETAIL PROBLEM

In all, there are now over 25 digital content cards being sold at retail. I've been tracking this and that's over double what it was six months ago. That means that at least a dozen online communities, and probably a dozen more in the next six months, are going to be submitting themselves to the vagaries of the retail shelf-space business. That's a business the online web folks have little to no experience in, and one that a lot of traditional gaming vets were excited to get out of.

This is creating a funnel problem that every creator or player should be a little worried about. It means that anyone can create an online game, but there is going to be scarcity around who can make money at it. Big media companies, communities that are already at critical mass, and big-hype start-ups get shelf space - while the next big thing in a garage doesn't get a shot in hell at monetizing.

In was a long hard slog at Ambient Devices getting our products into everywhere from Radioshack to the Museum of Modern Art store. It was even harder keeping them there despite strong sales as the hot new thing came out. That background will serve Conduit well when the time comes, but I'm still worried about what it will do the overall market. The last thing any of us wants to see is for monetization to be only held to the precious few so that everyone else is forced to go to completely free. That could collapse the market for everyone.

THE TARGET: THE ONLINE GIFT CARD?

How do you allow for monetization through retail to help with the credit card problem, but without introducing the shelf space problem that could hurt everyone? Perhaps there needs to be a standard